data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0926/e092696f2a4ef5544f5522c42edf9ecbda6f314a" alt="Xbox ultimate game pass"
Sony, meanwhile, now gets to sell millions of copies of its game at $70. Microsoft already has to justify Game Pass’ offerings of new first party games for the monthly sub, but I imagine that gets a lot harder with a slate of upcoming releases that could be acquired and beaten within that $1 first month.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff34a/ff34a5b231530a8c34b2721229d925f05a72c119" alt="xbox ultimate game pass xbox ultimate game pass"
This is the difference between Microsoft’s Game Pass philosophy and Sony’s “we’re almost never going to do big game launches within subscriptions” model. Starfield, being a mainline Bethesda game, probably has a few hundred hours buried in it, if not thousands, like past Fallout and Elder Scrolls games, but exploration and multiple playthroughs aside, it is fundamentally a single player game you could beat in a month if you were looking to only spend a buck to play it on Xbox or PC. My guess is that Redfall, certainly, could be completed within a month, if not a week of hardcore play.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0926/e092696f2a4ef5544f5522c42edf9ecbda6f314a" alt="Xbox ultimate game pass"